corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 19030

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Welch HG, Woloshin S, Schwartz LM.
The sea of uncertainty surrounding ductal carcinoma in situ--the price of screening mammography.
J Natl Cancer Inst 2008 2 12; 100:(4):228-9
http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/content/100/4/228.long


Abstract:

Wouldn’t it be easier if we lived in a binary world? Everything would be either black or white, yes or no, 1 or 0. And biopsy results would be either normal or cancer.

Unfortunately, in the world of cancer, our efforts to detect the disease early have made this a fantasy. We are increasingly faced with the reality of a big gray zone—a broad spectrum of pathologic findings between normal tissue and invasive cancer. And our nosology reflects the associated ambiguity—dysplasia, intraepithelial neoplasia, hyperplasia with atypia, and even abnormalities of “unknown significance.” The unifying theme for these findings is that they may progress to invasive cancer. Or they may not.

Despite the presence of the word “carcinoma,” ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is the poster child for this problem (a senior pathologist involved in developing classification systems confided to one of us that he regretted the use of the term carcinoma in DCIS). No one believes that DCIS always progresses to invasive cancer, and no one believes it never does. Although no one is sure what the probability of progression is, studies of DCIS that were missed at biopsy (1,2) and the autopsy reservoir (3) suggest that the lifetime risk of progression must be considerably less than 50%. …

Keywords:
Autopsy Biopsy Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis* Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology* Breast Neoplasms/pathology Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/diagnosis* Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/epidemiology* Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/pathology Female Humans Mammography* Mass Screening Palpation Population Surveillance* Risk Assessment Risk Factors Uncertainty

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








You are going to have many difficulties. The smokers will not like your message. The tobacco interests will be vigorously opposed. The media and the government will be loath to support these findings. But you have one factor in your favour. What you have going for you is that you are right.
- Evarts Graham
See:
When truth is unwelcome: the first reports on smoking and lung cancer.