corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 18890

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Mathew JC
US drug lobby to meet key govt officials this week
Business Standard 2010 Oct 21
http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/us-drug-lobby-to-meet-key-govt-officials-this-week/412250/


Full text:

Representatives of the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PHRMA) – the powerful drug lobby of US-based drug multinationals – are planning a series of high-level meetings with key central government officials in Delhi this week.

The meeting comes against the backdrop of a move by the Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion (Dipp) to explore the possibilities of issuing compulsory licences to domestic drug manufacturers to make low-cost versions of patented essential medicines available.

While PHRMA sources termed the scheduled meetings as “routine”, civil society groups see this as a move meant to “stall” the process of compulsory licensing.

In an open letter to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh today, 13 civil society groups wanted the government to go ahead with plans to increase the accessibility of essential medicines to common man.

In a joint response on September 29, PHRMA and its European counterpart had said that a policy to encourage compulsory licences on intellectual property would be counter-productive for the domestic drug industry. It also said Dipp’s discussion note on the topic contained several inaccurate and misleading statements that need rectification.

Of the 30 responses received by Dipp on its discussion note, at least 10 support the PHRMA views. The world’s biggest drug firm Pfizer, which had submitted a similar opinion in its individual capacity initially, had later withdrawn its response.

According to industry officials, the PHRMA delegation will meet officials in the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO), as well as the ministries of health and chemicals during October 21-22. The team is also expected to express its concern over some suggestions made by the parliamentary panel on the need to restrict foreign takeovers of Indian drug companies.

Incidentally, the demands raised by the foreign drug manufacturers through the Organization of Pharmaceutical Producers of India before PMO got rejected after the nodal department Dipp shot down those proposals to make Indian patent laws more stringent.

The open letter from civil society groups such as All India Peoples Science Network, Jan Swasthya Abhiyan and All India Drug Action Network wanted the government to put a cap on foreign direct investment on the ownership of pharma companies. It also wanted liberal use of compulsory licences.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909