corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 18744

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Silverman E
Want To Milk A Cash Cow? Try Pediatric Exclusivity
Pharmalot 2010 Oct 7
http://www.pharmalot.com/2010/10/want-to-milk-a-cash-cow-try-pediatric-exclusivity/


Notes:

See link for graph.


Full text:

When drugmakers look to milk their existing cash cows just a little more, what’s the best strategy? Although pediatric exclusivity can certainly boost cash flow, tinkering with a drug’s underlying science may actually yield more long-term value, according to a report by Cutting Edge Information, which queried 28 drugmakers as part of its study.
What the industry likes to call life cycle management can be pursued through different means, of course. And this includes pediatric exclusivity, new indications, new formulations, patent retention, next generation versions, authorized generics or a form of strategic pricing. But each approach comes with a price. For instance, four of the strategies require clinical trials.
As the chart indicates, pediatric exclusivity is the most profitable – earning $130 for each $1 spent – and requires relatively small trials for an additional six months of market exclusivity. For the biggest sellers, of course, those six months can be worth huge amounts of money. One exec confessed his company once gained pediatric exclusivity with just 10 days left before the patent expired, but that was worth an an extra $550 million in sales.
Nonetheless, drugmakers often lack the time to complete such trials. And when trials yield unanticipated shortcomings, brand teams may have less time to come up with back-up plans. One the other hand, new indications, different formulations and next-generation versions take longer to execute than pediatric exclusivity.
Yet while their return on income is not as high as pediatric exclusivity, the increase in net revenue can exceed other options. Moreover, new formulations or next-generation products can presumably offer financial gains that last longer than pediatric exclusivity. For those cannot see the chart, the return for new indications was $29.92 for each $1 spent, while new formulations generated $26.20 for every $1 spent. At the other end of the spectrum, authorized generics yielded $10.80 and pricing offered a $10 return for each $1 spent. A next-generation med returned $11.33.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909