corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 18618

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Electronic Source

Hobson K
More Than a Quarter of Prescription Takers Cut Corners to Save Money
The Wall Street Journal Blog 2010 Aug 24
http://blogs.wsj.com/health/2010/08/24/more-than-a-quarter-of-prescription-takers-cut-corners-to-save-money/


Full text:

More than a quarter of Americans who take prescription drugs have skipped doses, split pills or cut other corners to save money in the last year, according to a new study by Consumer Reports.

(The survey also asked prescription-drug users what they thought about the pharma industry’s influence on their physicians – more on that in a sec.)

The WSJ has written that U.S. consumers are cutting back on their use of health-care services, which is likely due to the state of the economy but may also reflect a more lingering trend as consumers pick up a bigger percentage of their medical costs.

This telephone survey, of 1,154 adults who currently take at least one prescription drug, found that 27% “failed to comply” with their prescriptions in some way during the past year. Most commonly that involved skipping a prescription fill, taking an expired medication, skipping a dose, splitting pills or sharing a prescription with someone else.

That kind of cutback was most common among people who were under age 65 and didn’t have prescription-drug coverage.

For 64% of respondents, the first they heard about the cost of a prescription was when they picked it up from a pharmacist. About half agreed with the notion that doctors don’t consider a patient’s ability to pay when they prescribe a drug.

Now, to the pharma-industry influence questions … nearly 70% of those surveyed agreed, to some extent, with the notion that pharma companies have too much influence on physicians’ prescription decisions. (It should be noted that with this type of question, phrasing is everything.)

Some 47% agreed with the idea that physicians’ prescription choices are influenced by pharma-industry gifts; they were also concerned about the practice of rewarding physicians who write a lot of prescriptions for a given drug (81%) and paying doctors for testimonials or as spokespersons (72%).

Consumers themselves aren’t immune from pharma-industry influence: 20% reported requesting from a doctor a drug they’d heard about via direct-to-consumer advertising. Of those, nearly 59% came away with a prescription. Two-thirds have received free samples from their physician – and people with high incomes and prescription drug coverage were the most likely to get them.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909