corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 18504

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Electronic Source

Edwards J
The Sanofi Suicides: Who Knew What About Failed Diet Drug?
BNet 2010 July 30
http://www.bnet.com/blog/drug-business/the-sanofi-suicides-who-knew-what-about-failed-diet-drug/5201


Full text:

A federal judge has reinstated a shareholder lawsuit against Sanofi-Aventis (SNY) that claims the company hid data linking its failed diet drug to suicides, a move that may solve the juicy mystery of how Sanofi bungled what was supposed to be a €4.5 billion blockbuster.

It’s also a case study that shows managers how being fully transparent can reduce your liability to litigation: Although the company claims it disclosed all the side effects of Zimulti (also called Acomplia or rimonabant) it was not clear from the company’s press releases how serious the risks of suicide and suicidal thoughts were for patients on the obesity drug. Bloomberg reports that the FDA rejected Zimulti because:

… people who took the drug were twice as likely to have thoughts of suicide as those who took a placebo. Three patients taking the drug killed themselves during clinical trials.

Now look at how Sanofi described those risks in two crucial press releases prior to the FDA rejecting the drug. On Oct 27, 2006, the company said:

Side effects were mainly mild, transient, self- limiting and occurred early in the treatment period. The most frequent side effects included … anxiety (5.0% for rimonabant 20 mg once daily vs. 2.6% for placebo).

The most frequent adverse events leading to discontinuation were depressed mood disorders, nausea and dizziness.

On Dec. 5, 2006, the company said:

The most common side effects with placebo and rimonabant 20 mg reported in the SERENADE trial were … anxiety (3.6% vs. 5.8%), depressed mood (0.7% vs. 5.8%), … The rate of serious adverse events was 3.6% for patients in the placebo arm versus 6.5% for patients in the rimonabant 20 mg.

… The most common adverse events leading to discontinuation for the placebo and rimonabant 20 mg patients, respectively, were nausea (0% vs. 2.2%), depressed mood disorder (0% vs. 2.2%) and paraesthesia (0% vs. 2.2%) .

The same day, according to an earlier ruling in the case, Sanofi executives on a conference call with Wall Street analysts investors said:

… in fact, there is a numerically smaller number of cases of depression in rimonabant 20 milligram, indicating that whatever we’re seeing in this general area, seems to be mild …

The word “suicide” or “suicidal” occurs in neither of the company’s releases. When the FDA nixed the drug, the complaint claims, the stock fell from $44.94 to $41.33 in two days.

The earlier ruling rejected the case because the company revealed all the information it had regarding Zimulti’s risks and shareholders (although it’s hard to read Sanofi’s statements and conclude that the drug’s suicide risk was double). The new ruling – which doesn’t explain what’s changed – says the shareholders have cured the “fatal deficiencies” in their first complaint and will be allowed to file an amended one. The question is, has a new smoking gun emerged?

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909