corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 18470

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Magazine

Colyer S
TGA clamps down on breast test devices
Australian Doctor Weekly 2010 July 21
http://www.australiandoctor.com.au/articles/56/0C06AF56.asp


Full text:

EXPERTS are welcoming a Therapeutic Goods Administration crackdown on medical devices marketed as an alternative to
mammography, but say greater regulation is needed.

The TGA has been investigating the unauthorised promotion of breast screening equipment and has assessed the evidence
supporting “breast screening functions” claimed for products listed on the Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods.

Chief Medical Officer Professor Jim Bishop said the investigation resulted in the removal of two devices from the
register – a thermographic infra-red scanner and an electrical impedance scanner.

TGA documents showed the devices were initially registered for purposes such as “diagnosing and assessing various
conditions and disease states”.

Professor Bishop said a further two devices were also under investigation.

He said the Federal Government was concerned about techniques such as thermography, compression testing and electrical
impedence, which “may be perceived by women as a valid form of alternative breast screening”.

But he noted the TGA’s power was limited to regulating device manufacturers and sponsors, and did not extend to
companies using the equipment.

Under current regulations, companies can continue to use deregistered devices, provided they were not recalled for
safety reasons, he said.

BreastScreen WA and Cancer Council WA recently published a report identifying seven companies offering alternative
breast screening in Perth that promoted their services as safe, comfortable, able to detect tumours earlier than
mammography, and suitable for women aged under 40.

Professor Christobel Saunders, professor of surgical oncology at the University of WA, said the TGA’s investigation was
a step forward in regulating alternative breast screening devices, but greater legislative controls were needed.

“Being able to remove the title of ‘TGA approved’ is a good step, because the tag immediately makes people think these
devices are not only ‘not dangerous’ but that they offer a benefit,” she said.

“But we also need legislative control over the use of unproven and potentially dangerous tests,” she said, so that
device users – and not just their manufacturers and sponsors – were held accountable.

Professor David Currow, CEO and chief cancer officer of the Cancer Institute NSW, was also concerned, saying there was
no reason for women to turn to alternative providers when mammography through BreastScreen was available.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909