corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 18464

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Are Doctors Giving Patients the Best Vaccines or the Vaccines with the Best Price?
PharmaLive 2010 July 6
http://pharmalive.com/news/index.cfm?articleid=715604


Abstract:

CREW Sends Letter to FTC Requesting Antitrust Investigation of Drug Companies


Full text:

Today, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) sent a letter to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) asking for an antitrust investigation into drug companies that offer significant discounts to doctors for providing patients with only that company’s vaccines. CREW sent its letter after learning that Sanofi Pasteur and Merck require physician healthcare groups purchasing their vaccines to enter into contracts prohibiting them from purchasing vaccines made by other companies.

CREW Executive Director Melanie Sloan stated, “Patients presume that doctors choose vaccines based on the patient’s best interests. Now we learn that’s not always true. In some cases, doctors are choosing vaccines based on the discounts offered by the drug manufacturer.”

To entice physician healthcare groups to purchase their vaccines, Sanofi Pasteur and Merck offer significant price discounts if the healthcare groups agree to buy all of their vaccines solely from one manufacturer. The discounts are conditioned on an express agreement that the healthcare groups will use only the offering drug company’s vaccines as well as other products. If any member of the practice fails to comply with this exclusivity requirement, the entire practice loses the discounts.

As a result of these restrictive contracts, physicians are barred from offering patients alternative vaccines even when they are demonstrably more effective and their use would be in the patients’ best interests. For example, Sanofi Pasteur, which markets the meningitis vaccine Menactra, bars doctors from offering Novartis’s vaccine, Menveo, even though some studies indicate Menveo may offer greater protection to teenagers.

CREW argues these contracts suppress competition, prevent new and potentially more effective vaccines from entering the market, and stifle innovation in an industry that receives generous federal funding. They also deprive consumers of the best healthcare.

Sloan continued, “No one should have to question their physicians’ motives, but the practices of companies like Sanofi Pasteur and Merck suggest we should all be questioning our doctors closely about why they chose a particular vaccine.”

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909