corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 18410

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Electronic Source

Rich
What do physicians think of 'Avandia' mess ?
World of DTC Marketing 2010 July 13
http://web.archive.org/web/20101225124058/http://worldofdtcmarketing.com/what-do-physicians-think-of-avandia-mess/marketing-to-health-care-professionals/


Full text:

Yesterday I received a call from a client who wanted to readdress some of the market research we did around the relationship of a drug company and physicians. He was concerned that the latest news around Avandia and GSK might have an impact on the whole industry. After we talked our market research agency agreed to contact 100 physicians by phone and ask three questions.

The three questions we asked were:

1. Do you see/have patients who have Type 2 diabetes ? (no terminate)

2. Have you, over the last 2-4 years written Rx’s for Avandia ?

3. Are you aware of the current news surrounding past Avandia clinical trials ?

4. How is this news effecting your choice of medications for your diabetic patients & how do you feel about drug company clinical trial information that is available ?

We wanted to target 100 physicians the the phone interviews were conducted yesterday via the telephone to primary care physicians.

RESPONSE:

Physicians who see diabetes patients are “aware” of the current controversy around Avandia clinical trial data.
The majority of physicians (+75%) who have written Rx’s for Avandia are either switching patients to other medications or would feel much better if patients were on other medications.
Asked to describe their attitude of “drug company presented clinical trial data” most said they were “very disappointed”. Interesting to not that not only were they disappointed in GSK but almost half said they were also disappointed in the FDA.
Finally a majority (67%) said that this would NOT taint all clinical trial data but that it depends on what company is presenting the data. A direct quote “if you’re asking me if I trust some pharmaceutical companies more than others, the answer would have to be yes, I do”
My client wanted me to share these preliminary findings with readers because like he said “this is just too big and effects too many of us” to keep closed.

Given the additional news stories today that GSK withheld data our market research agency wants to do another phone research panel later this week to see if the story has momentum.

Lot’s of negative buzz around Avandia on Twitter

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909