corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 18338

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Applbaum K
Shadow science: Zyprexa, Eli Lilly and the globalization of pharmaceutical damage control
BioSocieties 2010; 5:236-255
http://www.palgrave-journals.com/biosoc/journal/v5/n2/abs/biosoc20105a.html


Abstract:

In 2002, following reports of adverse side effects experienced by Japanese patients taking the antipsychotic medication, Zyprexa, Japan’s Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare required Eli Lilly & Co. to place a new warning label on its drug and to send out a ‘doctors letter’. The company feared that this would threaten its sales of Zyprexa not just in Japan, but globally. US court documents from suits against Lilly in 2006 show how Lilly focused their scientific and sales attention not on the reported side effects of their drug, but on how prescribing physicians perceived the side effect profile of the drug. The company actively pursued a strategy of creating a shadow science to drown out noncompany-sponsored (and competitors’) research reports on the side effects of the drug. I draw on ethnographic research in Japan to describe how Lilly dealt with the threat to the brand equity of Zyprexa there, and how they sought to keep their global marketing program for the drug on course. I conclude with a discussion of the encounter between the global marketing aspiration of the firm and the contingencies associated with the Japanese environment in particular.

Keywords:
pharmaceuticals; marketing; Japan; antipsychotics; globalization; regulation

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








...to influence multinational corporations effectively, the efforts of governments will have to be complemented by others, notably the many voluntary organisations that have shown they can effectively represent society’s public-health interests…
A small group known as Healthy Skepticism; formerly the Medical Lobby for Appropriate Marketing) has consistently and insistently drawn the attention of producers to promotional malpractice, calling for (and often securing) correction. These organisations [Healthy Skepticism, Médecins Sans Frontières and Health Action International] are small, but they are capable; they bear malice towards no one, and they are inscrutably honest. If industry is indeed persuaded to face up to its social responsibilities in the coming years it may well be because of these associations and others like them.
- Dukes MN. Accountability of the pharmaceutical industry. Lancet. 2002 Nov 23; 360(9346)1682-4.