corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 18324

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Bliss J
U.S. House Approves Restrictions on Deals Between Drugmakers
Bloomberg.com 2010 July 2
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-07-02/u-s-house-approves-curbs-on-drugmaker-deals-that-delay-generic-medicines.html


Full text:

The U.S. House approved a measure restricting the ability of drugmakers to enter agreements that the Federal Trade Commission has said keep generic medicines off the market.

Companies could be fined under the measure if the FTC and courts find they are involved in settlements that preserve a brand-name pharmaceutical firm’s patent by delaying a generic- drug maker’s introduction of a lower-priced product. The proposal, included in a war-funding bill that passed the House last night, now goes to the Senate.

The House action is “just another signal of the growing support in Congress for ending this unconscionable behavior by some pharmaceutical companies,” FTC Chairman Jon Leibowitz said in an interview before the vote.

Leibowitz has made restrictions on so-called pay-for-delay deals one of his priorities. Such payments are made by brand- name drug companies to makers of generics to postpone bringing generic products to market, he said.

The restriction was included in an amendment to the war- funding bill, approved on a 239-182 vote.

Drugmakers are lobbying against the provision, and passage in the Senate isn’t assured. At a June 9 hearing, Senators Orrin Hatch, a Utah Republican, and Arlen Specter, a Pennsylvania Democrat, said they were concerned the FTC campaign against the deals may discourage agreements that benefit consumers.

No Distinction

“This is sweeping legislation that doesn’t make a distinction between pro-competitive and anti-competitive settlements,” Debra Barrett, senior vice president of government affairs at Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., said in an interview.

The FTC contends brand-name companies often offer generic- drug manufacturers licensing rights on a product or other compensation in exchange for an agreement that delays the marketing of cheaper drugs.

The deals often help consumers, Barrett said. Teva, the world’s largest generic-drug maker, said yesterday in a statement that a recent deal allowed it to introduce a version of Wyeth’s antidepressant Effexor seven years earlier than the patent would have allowed. Companies have said the settlements save time and the cost of litigation.

The legislation gives drug companies 30 days to appeal an FTC ruling on any deal.

The measure would also help offset the $10 billion House Democrats added to the war-funding bill to prevent the layoffs of an estimated 140,000 teachers.

The Congressional Budget Office estimates the restriction on drug agreements would save the government $2.4 billion over 10 years by reducing the cost of drugs purchased through Medicare, Medicaid and other government programs, according to a Democratic summary of the bill.

The war bill is H.R. 4899.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909