corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 18270

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Dobson R
Lack of new drugs is reaching crisis point, says review
BMJ 2003 Jan 18; 326:(7381):119
http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/extract/326/7381/119


Abstract:

The number of new drugs approved in the United States last year fell to half the annual average over the past five years.

Only 15 new drugs were approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2002, compared with a five year annual average of 31, says an editorial in Nature Reviews Drug Discovery (2003:2:3).

It warns that the fall in the number of new drugs is reaching crisis point and says that new drug applications are down worldwide.

It says that the European parliament’s environment committee has asked Thomas Lonngren, executive director of the European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products, to explain the fall in the number of applications.

“The miserable tally of new drug approvals in 2002—-at the time of writing, just 15 new molecular entities had passed FDA review—-well down even on the depressingly low average for the last five years—-31 a year, shows just how . . .

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








...to influence multinational corporations effectively, the efforts of governments will have to be complemented by others, notably the many voluntary organisations that have shown they can effectively represent society’s public-health interests…
A small group known as Healthy Skepticism; formerly the Medical Lobby for Appropriate Marketing) has consistently and insistently drawn the attention of producers to promotional malpractice, calling for (and often securing) correction. These organisations [Healthy Skepticism, Médecins Sans Frontières and Health Action International] are small, but they are capable; they bear malice towards no one, and they are inscrutably honest. If industry is indeed persuaded to face up to its social responsibilities in the coming years it may well be because of these associations and others like them.
- Dukes MN. Accountability of the pharmaceutical industry. Lancet. 2002 Nov 23; 360(9346)1682-4.