corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 18251

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Delamothe T
Half a billion here, half a billion there
BMJ 2010 Jun 10; 340:
http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/extract/340/jun10_1/c3072


Abstract:

To improve access for patients to costly medicines the Department of Health is looking at joint payment schemes with drug companies (doi:10.1136/bmj.c2832). This week we publish an object lesson in how not to run one.

As James Raftery explains, the UK’s first risk sharing scheme began in 2002 as a ruse to get round NICE’s ruling against use of interferon beta and glatiramer acetate in multiple sclerosis (doi:10.1136/bmj.c1672). The NHS would pay for the drugs, but cost effectiveness would be closely monitored, with an agreement to reduce prices if patients’ outcomes were worse than predicted. However, although outcomes were much worse than predicted (BMJ 2009;339:b4677, doi:10.1136/bmj.b4677), the prices haven’t come down.

The monitoring team says that to make a final judgment on the scheme now would be premature. But Christopher McCabe and colleagues say that its caveats have been known about since the . . .

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909