corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 18214

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Texas Blue Cross plan sues Pfizer over marketing
The Associated Press 2010 Jun 11
http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D9G97NHG0.htm


Full text:

A Texas health insurance company is suing Pfizer Inc. saying the drug maker deceptively marketed three of its top-selling drugs, illegally encouraging doctors to prescribe them for non-approved uses and paying kickbacks to doctors.

Health Care Service Corp., which runs Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texas and covers 12.4 million people in four states, filed the lawsuit against Pfizer on June 4.

Pfizer has settled other similar lawsuits and agreed in September to pay $2.3 billion in civil and criminal penalties over its promotion of Bextra, Lyrica, Geodon and other drugs.

Health Care Service Corp., which said it found out about Pfizer’s actions because of that settlement, claims the New York drug maker gave doctors misleading information about the safety and effectiveness of the anti-inflammatory drug Bextra, about anti-psychotic Geodon and about nerve pain and epilepsy treatment Lyrica.

The insurer claims in a lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas that Pfizer encouraged doctors to use the drugs for conditions they had not been approved to treat, a practice known as prescribing off-label.

Doctors can legally prescribe drugs off-label, but drug companies can’t promote them to treat illnesses not listed on their federally approved labels.

The insurer also claims Pfizer paid kickbacks to doctors who prescribed the drugs.

Health Care Service Corp. did not say when the events occurred, but Bextra was pulled off the U.S. market in 2005 after evidence linked it to increased risk of heart attack, stroke and death.

Pfizer spokesman Chris Loder said the company denies all the allegations.

“This is a case of an insurance company seeking its money back for medicines that physicians prescribed appropriately using their best medical judgments,” he said.

The lawsuit names Pfizer, its Pharmacia & Upjohn unit and four individuals: Rick Burch, who led Pfizer’s arthritis and pain drug business; Jake Friedman, who led the business responsible for promoting drugs including Lyrica and Geodon; Mark Brown, who was involved in marketing anti-infection and HIV and AIDS drugs; and Matthew Lustig, a district sales manager in South Florida.

Pfizer shares rose 44 cents, or 3 percent, to $15.35 in afternoon trading.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








As an advertising man, I can assure you that advertising which does not work does not continue to run. If experience did not show beyond doubt that the great majority of doctors are splendidly responsive to current [prescription drug] advertising, new techniques would be devised in short order. And if, indeed, candor, accuracy, scientific completeness, and a permanent ban on cartoons came to be essential for the successful promotion of [prescription] drugs, advertising would have no choice but to comply.
- Pierre R. Garai (advertising executive) 1963