corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 18197

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Cooney B
Can you provide any guidelines on speaker honoraria for virtual meetings?
Ask The Experts 2010 May 18
http://medad.canon-experts.com/2010/05/guidelines-on-speaker-honoraria/


Full text:

Generally our clients at pharma and biotech companies create their own guidelines for honoraria based on Fair Market Value (FMV) criteria. We’ve observed that most companies set honoraria for virtual speaker events much lower than for local events, on the basis that the time commitment (and therefore FMV) for speakers is much lower for virtual events.

A recent survey of speaker program managers at pharma and biotech companies indicates that prevailing rates for virtual speaker honoraria are indeed much lower. A 2009 survey by Cutting Edge Information reported that honoraria for virtual events were 67% to 70% lower than honoraria for local events. This translates both into big cost savings, and the ability to use the best speakers more often per year without exceeding annual honoraria limits.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909