corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 18191

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Burton B
Ban direct to consumer advertising, report recommends
BMJ 2003 Mar 1; 326:(7387):467
http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/extract/326/7387/467/a


Abstract:

A report on direct to consumer advertising of prescription only medicines in New Zealand has recommended that the practice be banned.

The report, by senior academic staff at all four of New Zealand’s medical schools, concluded that such advertising, which is allowed in New Zealand, does not give “objective information on risks, benefits and options to assist patients to participate in healthcare decisions.”

Professor Les Toop, from the University of Otago’s Christchurch School of Medicine and Health Sciences, and his five colleagues recommended that “an independent health information service” be established to inform consumers on health and treatment options instead of direct to consumer advertising.

Unlike in the United States, the only other developed country that allows direct to consumer advertising, in New Zealand the health department does not routinely monitor advertising. Complaints about advertisements are dealt with under self regulatory codes run by . .

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Cases of wilful misrepresentation are a rarity in medical advertising. For every advertisement in which nonexistent doctors are called on to testify or deliberately irrelevant references are bunched up in [fine print], you will find a hundred or more whose greatest offenses are unquestioning enthusiasm and the skill to communicate it.

The best defence the physician can muster against this kind of advertising is a healthy skepticism and a willingness, not always apparent in the past, to do his homework. He must cultivate a flair for spotting the logical loophole, the invalid clinical trial, the unreliable or meaningless testimonial, the unneeded improvement and the unlikely claim. Above all, he must develop greater resistance to the lure of the fashionable and the new.
- Pierre R. Garai (advertising executive) 1963