corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 18049

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Gibson L
Medicines agency introduces greater transparency
BMJ 2003 Dec 13; 327:(7428):1368
http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/extract/327/7428/1368-d


Abstract:

The Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), which was officially launched last week, has initiated several moves to improve its transparency and public profile.

The agency has decided to publish the outcome of its investigations into complaints about pharmaceutical company advertising.

It will publish on its website the outcome of complaints received from 1 December. Details will include a description of the complaint (the name of the company and product); the date of the complaint and its source (which will be anonymised), the agency’s conclusion; and what action has been agreed with the company (whether the advertisement is to be amended or to be withdrawn or whether a corrective statement is to be issued).

The pharmaceutical industry currently regulates itself through the Prescription Medicines Code of Practice Authority, which is based at the same offices as the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry. Although the authority . . .

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Cases of wilful misrepresentation are a rarity in medical advertising. For every advertisement in which nonexistent doctors are called on to testify or deliberately irrelevant references are bunched up in [fine print], you will find a hundred or more whose greatest offenses are unquestioning enthusiasm and the skill to communicate it.

The best defence the physician can muster against this kind of advertising is a healthy skepticism and a willingness, not always apparent in the past, to do his homework. He must cultivate a flair for spotting the logical loophole, the invalid clinical trial, the unreliable or meaningless testimonial, the unneeded improvement and the unlikely claim. Above all, he must develop greater resistance to the lure of the fashionable and the new.
- Pierre R. Garai (advertising executive) 1963