corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 17936

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Electronic Source

Morrison T
AstraZeneca Learns the FDA May Have Gotten Wise to Copy-Cat Drugs
BNet 2010 Jun 4
http://industry.bnet.com/pharma/10008420/astrazeneca-learns-the-fda-may-have-gotten-wise-to-copy-cat-drugs/


Full text:

Could it be that the FDA is throwing up some roadblocks against the ever-popular pharma business strategy of taking a drug that is about to go off-patent, tweaking it a bit, and selling it as a new product with a new, high price tag?

Pharma has been making big bucks off the “everything old is new again” approach for decades. Case in point is AstraZeneca’s (AZN) ulcer drug Nexium (esomeprazole), which hit the market just as blockbuster Prilosec (omeprazole) went off patent. But that’s just one example. There are many others, including asthma drugs Claritin (loratadine) and Clarinex (desloratidine), antidepressants Effexor (venlafaxine) and Pristiq (desvenlafaxine), and pain drugs Neurontin (gabapentin) and Lyrica (pregabalin).

The trouble is, it isn’t always clear that the new version of the drug is any better than the old version. And sometimes, it might be worse.

That’s the problem AstraZeneca ran into this week during an FDA expert panel review of respiratory syncytial virus drug Rezield (motavizumab), a follow-on version to blockbuster Synagis (palivizumab), which goes off patent in 2015.

Panel members voted 14 to 3 that the new drug’s risks outweigh its benefits, mainly because of allergic reactions not seen with the old drug. According to BioWorld Today, one panelist said:

Motavizumab does have an effect, but no one can say at this time that it is more effective than palivizumab.

Although AstraZeneca did run head-to-head trials between the two drugs, panelists questioned some of the analyses. And an ongoing lawsuit by an employee who claims he was terminated for looking into problems with the data probably didn’t help matters.

It will be interesting to see if the FDA follows its advisory committee’s advice when it makes its ruling on motavizumab’s approvability later this month. Last week, the agency issued a complete response letter for another of AstraZeneca’s Nexium follow-on drugs. Could change be in the wind?

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909