corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 17914

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Ed.
Europe on the brink of direct-to-consumer drug advertising
Lancet 2002 May 18; 359:(9319):1709
http://www.lancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(02)08637-3/fulltext


Abstract:

arlier in May, David Kessler, former commissioner of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) made a surprising U-turn about direct-to-consumer advertising (DTCA) of prescription-only drugs. According to the May 2 Boston Globe, Kessler, now dean of Yale University School of Medicine, told a drug-industry conference on DTCA that he had been wrong to oppose such advertising. While head of the FDA from 1990 to 1997, Kessler had vigorously opposed DTCA. Soon after he left, the FDA relaxed its rules on DTCA and the floodgates opened, especially for DTCA on television in the USA. Spending on DTCA by the pharmaceutical industry increases year on year in the USA, and reached US$2·5 billion in 2000 compared with $860 million in 1997.
DTCA is only allowed in the USA and New Zealand, but last July the European Commission proposed changes in EU law to allow DTCA for three disease areas-AIDS/HIV, diabetes, and asthma-for a 5-year period followed by a review. This suggested change in the law was driven by DG Enterprise, the Commission’s division with special responsibility for promoting business. Although the proposal was said to have arisen as a result of demand from patients’ groups, the Commission remains unable to show what groups made the demand, why these three disease areas were singled out, and what form the review will take.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909