corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 17855

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Electronic Source

Herper M
The Death Of The Blockbuster Drug
The Science Business (Forbes Blog) 2010 May 28
http://blogs.forbes.com/sciencebiz/2010/05/the-death-of-the-blockbuster-drug/


Full text:

Big drug companies used to ignore medicines that wouldn’t be prescribed to millions of patients. These days they seem to be unable to invent any.

Consider this: It has been four years since any company launched a real mass-market blockbuster, that is, a drug that generates billions of dollars in sales based on the fact that it’s widely used, not just expensive. The last big winner was Januvia, from Merck, which was launched in 2006 and now has annual sales of $1.9 billion. (The other contender would be Merck’s Gardasil vaccine, also launched in 2006.)

At the same time, drugs are losing sales to generics faster and more brutally than before. When we spoke to IMS Health about the most prescribed drugs in the country (all generic except Pfizer’s Lipitor, which goes generic next year) Murray Aitken, an IMS vice president, offered this stat. In 2003, 61% of drug sales were for a medicine for which a generic version was available. In 2009, it was 81%. Back in 2003, 84% of patients would get the generic. Now, thanks to tougher rules by insurers and drug companies, 92% of those prescriptions are filled with the generic version. All told, 74% of the market is now generic drugs, compared to 51% in 2003. That means more Teva, less Pfizer.

So far, the solution drug companies have hit upon is to find medications they can charge a lot for. Some can cost $400,000 a year or more. (See: The Most Expensive Drugs.) The question is, how long can that continue?

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909