corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 17808

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Electronic Source

Edwards J
The Activist FDA: Warnings to Drug Companies Up 50% From Bush Era
BNet 2010 May 12
http://industry.bnet.com/pharma/10008115/under-obama-fda-warnings-to-drug-companies-increased-50-from-bush-era/


Full text:

The FDA’s new Bad Ad program – in which doctors are urged to call the feds if they hear or see a drug pitch they don’t like – is the latest example of the FDA’s renewed activism under President Obama. FDA warning letters – which cite drug companies for misleading advertising or bad manufacturing practices – have increased 31 percent since 2008, and 50 percent since 2007.

This year to date, the FDA has issued 186 warning letters, a rate that indicates 2009 will be another big year for drug company discipline. Last year the FDA issued the most warning letters in years – 570. In 2008, the last year of George W. Bush’s administration, the FDA only sent 436 letters. The year before just 381 were sent:

Source: FDA.

The Obama FDA has also looked at new types of advertising. In 2009 it cited 14 companies for using Google search ads to promote their products. Bayer (BAY)’s erectile dysfunction drug Levitra and Pfizer (PFE)’s anti-smoking pill Chantix were caught in that push.

More recently, the FDA cited Novartis (NVS) for two unbranded Web sites that it claimed were misleadingly promoting the company’s cancer drug, Gleevec. Neither site actually mentioned the drug, but the FDA said the material on them hinted heavily that Gleevec was recommended and thus the site were drug ads and not the more lightly regulated category of health information “help-seeking” ads.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909