corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 17767

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Hopkins Tanne J
GSK is accused of trying to suppress editorial on rosiglitazone
BMJ 2010 May 19; 340:
http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/extract/340/may19_2/c2654


Abstract:

GlaxoSmithKline faces several new issues over its drug rosiglitazone (Avandia) and possible cardiovascular problems.

The company has had to answer reports that it had asked the European Heart Journal not to publish in print an online editorial that was critical of the drug. It was also reported to have settled lawsuits relating to rosiglitazone and has faced calls for the US Food and Drug Administration to stop an international trial and demands from members of Congress asking why the drug had not been recalled.

The company denied charges, first reported at www.cardiobrief.org, that it had tried to prevent the European Heart Journal from publishing in its print edition an online editorial, “The rise and fall of rosiglitazone,” by Steven Nissen of the Cleveland Clinic (2010;31;773-6, doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehq016). In 2007 Dr Nissen raised the issue of possible cardiovascular problems with rosiglitazone in a paper in the New England Journal . . .

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








...to influence multinational corporations effectively, the efforts of governments will have to be complemented by others, notably the many voluntary organisations that have shown they can effectively represent society’s public-health interests…
A small group known as Healthy Skepticism; formerly the Medical Lobby for Appropriate Marketing) has consistently and insistently drawn the attention of producers to promotional malpractice, calling for (and often securing) correction. These organisations [Healthy Skepticism, Médecins Sans Frontières and Health Action International] are small, but they are capable; they bear malice towards no one, and they are inscrutably honest. If industry is indeed persuaded to face up to its social responsibilities in the coming years it may well be because of these associations and others like them.
- Dukes MN. Accountability of the pharmaceutical industry. Lancet. 2002 Nov 23; 360(9346)1682-4.