corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 17679

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Electronic Source

Edwards J
PowerPoint Fail: Pfizer Slideshow Depicts Neurontin as a Witch's Brew
BNet 2010 Apr 14
http://industry.bnet.com/pharma/10007692/how-not-to-use-powerpoint-pfizer-slideshow-shows-a-witch-with-a-neurontin-cauldron/


Full text:

Pfizer (PFE)’s marketing team created a PowerPoint slide which depicted its anti-seizure drug Neurontin as a witch’s brew (pictured) and its marketing unit as a magic cauldron – an apparent indication they believed the pill could be used for virtually any type of central nervous system disorder, legal or not.

The drug was also referred to internally as “snake oil.” Both are indicators that dubbing your product with a cute internal nickname can be a bad idea.

UPDATE: Inside Pfizer’s Neurontin Ghostwriting Shop: Friendly Drug Studies for Just $1,000
The diagram in the October 2002 internal presentation showed a witch dumping ingredients into a smoking cauldron labeled with the Neurontin logo. It was created to show how Pfizer’s Medical Action Communications unit would “recruit KOLs [key opinion leaders] to address multiple priorities simultaneously.”

The same diagram shows various pain-related conditions, such as diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN), even though the FDA did not approve Neurontin to be used for those conditions. It’s illegal for drug companies to promote pills for unapproved uses. At the bottom of the slide, a cauldron labelled “MAC” – which probably stands for the name of the marketing unit, “Medical Action Communications” – emits comical flames:

(Click to enlarge.)

The Kaiser Foundation Hospitals and Kaiser Foundation Health Plan used the slide in a lawsuit which claimed they were misled into believing the drug was appropriate for migraines and bipolar disorder. The Oakland, Calif.-based HMO alleged it was forced to pay $90 million more than it should have for the drug. The jury awarded Kaiser $142 million in damages; that verdict followed a $430 million settlement with the Department of Justice for promoting the drug for unapproved uses.

An email in the same case showed a Pfizer executive describing Neurontin as “snake oil.” According to another slide presented in the case, David Franklin, a former sales rep for Neurontin testified:

… we ended up referring to this as snake oil, because of all these diverse indications.

Pfizer previously said about the case:

We are disappointed with the verdict and will pursue post-trial motions and an appeal … The verdict and the judge’s rulings are not consistent with the facts and the law.

Kaiser itself continues to recommend Neurontin for the same uses they sought recovery for in this case. Kaiser’s own physicians and several of their expert witnesses prescribed Neurontin for their patients based on their sound medical judgment.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909