corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 17649

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Bookwalter G
Assemblyman Bill Monning pulls his pharmaceutical bill
The Santa Cruz Sentinel 2010 Apr 17
http://www.thecalifornian.com/article/20100417/NEWS01/4170310/1002/Assemblyman-Bill-Monning-pulls-his-pharmaceutical-bil


Abstract:

Assemblyman says he will use time to rally support for next year


Full text:

Realizing it did not have the necessary votes to pass, Assemblyman Bill Monning this week shelved his bill that would have reined in the sale of doctors’ prescription records for marketing purposes.

Monning, D-Carmel, said he might reintroduce the bill, aimed at big pharmaceutical companies, in January if he can drum up enough support.

“We’re going to use this time frame to build more support and do more outreach,” Monning said. He pulled the bill just before it was to go to a vote on Tuesday in the Assembly’s Committee on Health after realizing that the votes he thought were lined up, were not.

“We didn’t have the time to cultivate members’ understandings of the issues,” Monning said. “There’s some intricacies.”

Assembly Bill 2112 followed efforts in other states to limit the information available to drug makers that, some say, use the data to push their products instead of what’s best or most cost-effective for patients. The bill was modeled after a similar law in New Hampshire.

Monning said access to a doctor’s prescribing habits allows drug companies to target physicians who might be more receptive to their sales pitches.

The California Medical Association and AARP California, among other groups, supported the bill.

Pharmaceutical industry groups and “data mining” companies – third-party firms that crunch and sell information obtained from pharmacies, doctor groups and other sources – spoke out against it.

Drug companies argued that possessing an individual physician’s prescribing data allows them to reach doctors quickly and directly with unique information they might not otherwise get.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909