corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 17469

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Electronic Source

Rubenstein S
Grassley Knocks Radio Host Goodwin for Drug-Industry Conflicts
The Wall Street Journal Blog 2008 Nov 21
http://blogs.wsj.com/health/2008/11/21/grassley-knock-npr-host-goodwin-for-drug-industry-conflicts/


Full text:

Sen. Chuck Grassley is squawking about another eyebrow-raising conflict-of-interest in psychiatry. This tale of drug-industry influence comes with another twist: It involves National Public Radio.

Perhaps you’ve listened to The Infinite Mind, the popular public-radio program hosted by psychiatrist Frederick Goodwin (pictured). On the award-winning program, Goodwin has talked about some big topics in the field that have also mattered commercially to drug makers, including one program in which he said “there is no credible evidence linking antidepressants to violence or suicide,” as quoted in the New York Times story on Goodwin this morning.

Well, it turns out Goodwin raked in at least $1.3 million from 2000 to 2007 giving marketing lectures for drug makers, the NYT reports. That includes some $20,000 from GlaxoSmithKline, the maker of antidepressant Paxil, the same week he hosted that show on antidepressants.

“The Infinite Mind” is being canceled. The folks in charge of the program, including Goodwin, say in retrospect that Goodwin’s conflicts should have been disclosed. But they aren’t seeing eye to eye on the history. Goodwin, a former director of the National Institute of Mental Health, told the Times that the program’s producer, Bill Lichtenstein, knew about the consulting gigs but that neither of the two men thought “getting money from drug companies could be an issue.”

But here’s what Lichtenstein told the Times: “The fact that he was out on the stump for pharmaceutical companies was not something we were aware of. It would have violated our agreements.”

As for Glaxo, a spokeswoman told NYT the company believes in disclosure, including to public-radio listeners.

Check out Pharmalot for some interesting resources, including details on Goodwin’s ties to Glaxo and a link to the Congressional Record with more on Grassley’s findings.

Grand Rounds: Here’s a roundup of Grassley’s revelations on industry payments to leading psychiatrists at Emory, the University of Texas, Stanford and Harvard.

Correction: “The Infinite Mind” has been carried on NPR’s Sirius Satellite Radio channel and other public radio stations, but it isn’t produced by NPR. Lichtenstein Creative Media produces the show. The initial version of this post called “The Infinite Mind” an NPR program.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909