corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 17443

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Electronic Source

Goldstein J
Univ. of Cincinnati Psychiatrist Under More Scrutiny Over Funding
The Wall Street Journal Blog 2008 Apr 21
http://blogs.wsj.com/health/2008/04/21/univ-of-cincinatti-psychiatrist-under-more-scrutiny-over-funding/


Full text:

An academic psychiatrist whose ties to AstraZeneca got called out by a U.S. senator a couple of weeks ago is getting a more scrutiny from her university.

AstraZeneca told Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) that the value of its payments to Melissa DelBello between 2005 and 2007 was $238,000 – some of which she apparently hadn’t reported to her bosses at the University of Cincinnati. DelBello has published research on the company’s antipsychotic drug Seroquel in children, including a 2002 study that concluded kids did well on the medicine.

Now DelBello has to review all of of her industry interactions with her department chairman, the Cincinnati Enquirer reports. Her personnel file will also reflect that she didn’t tell the university about some of her outside funding.

“It’s to protect her,” the university’s VP of research, Sandra Degen, told the paper. “Basically, we were documenting that there were some discrepancies in what was reported.”

DelBello declined to comment for the Enquirer’s article. Deven said there was no evidence that the funding affected the substance of DelBello’s research. “The main point is how the perceived conflict of interest is disclosed,” Degen told the paper. “As long as you disclose it, then it’s fine.”

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








...to influence multinational corporations effectively, the efforts of governments will have to be complemented by others, notably the many voluntary organisations that have shown they can effectively represent society’s public-health interests…
A small group known as Healthy Skepticism; formerly the Medical Lobby for Appropriate Marketing) has consistently and insistently drawn the attention of producers to promotional malpractice, calling for (and often securing) correction. These organisations [Healthy Skepticism, Médecins Sans Frontières and Health Action International] are small, but they are capable; they bear malice towards no one, and they are inscrutably honest. If industry is indeed persuaded to face up to its social responsibilities in the coming years it may well be because of these associations and others like them.
- Dukes MN. Accountability of the pharmaceutical industry. Lancet. 2002 Nov 23; 360(9346)1682-4.