corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 17404

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Will state medical councils wield the scalpel?
Business Standard 2010 Mar 15
http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/will-state-medical-councils-wieldscalpel/388638/


Full text:

It’s for them to enforce new rules on gift-taking doctors.

The implementation of the Medical Council of India’s (MCI) proposed penal punishment for doctors accepting cash and any other gifts from pharmaceutical companies would depend on individual states and the willingness of state medical councils to pursue action.

MCI’s proposals were a sequel to the voluntary code of ethical guidelines it published in January for all doctors. It had listed the favours a doctor should not accept from pharmaceutical companies.

The proposals have gone to the Union health ministry. Once approved, these would be notified and all states bound to adopt these. The implementation would be through the various state medical councils.

MCI President Ketan Desai, when asked how confident he was on the code’s implementation, replied: “There are states where law and order is good and states where it isn’t.” As an apex body, MCI is where appeals would be filed.

Several doctors felt it was the start of a needed process, though there may initially be problems with implementation. Former secretary-general of the Indian Medical Association, Vinay Aggarwal, said: “The practice of taking expensive gifts from pharmaceutical companies was increasing the cost of healthcare substantially. A process has been started.”

“Faith in the profession has been dented. We are trying to bring it back,” Desai said. “We are not trying to do any policing. We are professionals. This should not happen in a profession that is called noble,” he added.

When MCI came out with the voluntary code of conduct last December, several doctors had criticised it for lacking teeth. K Srinath Reddy, president of the Public Health Foundation of India, had then said there was need for strict penal provisions to check malpractices in the profession. MCI has now done so. It even plans to publish on its website the names of erring doctors, pharmaceutical companies and the nature of offence and punishment.

Doctors accepting gifts worth Rs 1,000 to Rs 5,000 would be censured — that is, issued a warning which would go into their record. Gifts up to Rs 10,000 would result in a three-month suspension from the medical register. For those up to Rs 50,000, the suspension would be up to six months. For gifts up to Rs 1 lakh, suspension ip to a year. And, beyond a year for taking more than this.

Desai said individual states could only increase these penalties. They could not bring down the term of punishment.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909