corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 17310

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Electronic Source

Edwards J
WebMD Caves on Rigged Depression Test: Not Everyone Is Suicidal, Apparently
BNet 2010 Feb 26
http://industry.bnet.com/pharma/10006916/webmd-caves-on-rigged-depression-test-not-everyone-is-suicidal-apparently/


Full text:

WebMD has changed its Eli Lilly (LLY)-sponsored depression test so that not every answer results in a diagnosis of potential major depression. BNET noted on Feb. 22 that if you checked the “no” box to all 10 symptoms in the online quiz, the results page said, “You may be at risk for major depression,” and urged users to call a doctor “right away” if they were feeling suicidal.

Now, the result for someone indicating no symptoms of depression says:

Lower Risk

You replied that you are feeling four or fewer of the common symptoms of depression. In general, people experiencing depression have five or more common symptoms of the condition. But every individual is unique. If you are concerned about depression, talk with your doctor.

(You can see a screen grab of the original results page here, and if you’re a real HTML geek you’ll notice that the old results remain hidden in the page’s source coding.)

While “lower risk” is certainly an improvement for someone indicating no symptoms of depression, WebMD is still gilding the Lilly. Depression isn’t something that happy people are likely to catch suddenly, like the flu. It takes a set of serious circumstances, extended over a period of time, to become truly clinically depressed. If you’re happy today, your “risk” of being depressed tomorrow is only “lower” in the sense that it’s so low it’s practically zero.

Sen. Charles Grassley wants the link between WebMD and Lilly investigated because he suspects people may rely on the test, thinking it is objective information when in fact it’s sponsored fluff. Lilly funded the test, which was accompanied by ads for its antidepressant pill, Cymbalta.

Hat tip to World of Psychology

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








There is no sin in being wrong. The sin is in our unwillingness to examine our own beliefs, and in believing that our authorities cannot be wrong. Far from creating cynics, such a story is likely to foster a healthy and creative skepticism, which is something quite different from cynicism.”
- Neil Postman in The End of Education