corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 17308

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Hirschler B
Call for UK to ditch Astra's Nexium, other drugs
Reuters 2010 Feb 26
http://uk.reuters.com/article/idUKLDE61O0EW20100226


Abstract:

  • Experts want NICE to abandon old drugs not worth using
  • Candidates include “me too” drugs and new formulations
  • Dropping some products will free funds for new ones


Full text:

Britain’s state health service should ditch some drugs that are not worth using, including AstraZeneca’s (AZN.L) top-seller Nexium for heartburn, to provide funds for new treatments, experts said on Friday.

Dyfrig Hughes of Bangor University and Robin Ferner of Birmingham’s City Hospital said such medicines could be relegated to a blacklist of products that cannot be prescribed on the National Health Service (NHS).

Their suggestion, in an article in the British Medical Journal, underscores a growing debate over value for money in healthcare.

Britain’s National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) has taken a global lead by recommending which drugs should be reimbursed on the NHS, using a systemised approach that is watched closely by other countries.

But Hughes and Ferner — the latter a member of NICE’s appeal panel — believe backing new treatments is only half the story and NICE should also cull old medicines that are not cost-effective.

“There are many that have been superseded by newer, more effective medicines and others that bring only trivial benefits over existing therapies while costing much more,” they wrote.

These include some but not all “me too” drugs — the term commonly used for new entrants into existing therapeutic categories.

The authors also hit out many of the medicines developed through “evergreening” strategies, in which drugmakers patent incremental changes and new formulations for drugs whose patents are about to expire.

One example is the heartburn and ulcer drug Nexium, which is 11 times more expensive than generic omeprazole and has no additional benefits, they said. The NHS spent 42 million pounds ($64 million) on Nexium last year in England alone.

“That 42 million pounds could be much better spent elsewhere,” Hughes said in a telephone interview.

A modified release version of AstraZeneca’s schizophrenia medicine Seroquel and a film-coated dispersible form of GlaxoSmithKline’s (GSK.L) migraine treatment Imigran were also cited as drugs that might be dropped.

“Both Nexium and Seroquel XL are clinically proven treatment options that bring benefits to many patients in the NHS,” AstraZeneca spokesman Neil McCrae said in response.

Another area of saving is seen in new measures to increase rates of generic prescribing — already 83 percent — which could produce annual savings of up to 72 million pounds by 2013.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909