corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 17293

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Electronic Source

Edwards J
WebMD's Depression Test Has Only One (Sponsored) Answer: You're 'At Risk'
BNet 2010 Feb 22
http://industry.bnet.com/pharma/10006801/webmds-depression-test-has-only-one-sponsored-answer-youre-at-risk/?tag=content


Full text:

Feeling depressed? Cheer yourself up by taking WebMD’s comical new depression test. It’s sponsored by Eli Lilly (LLY) – maker of the antidepressant Cymbalta – so they must know what they’re talking about, right? In fact, no matter which of the 10 answers you choose on the test, the result comes out the same:

You may be at risk for major depression.

Sen. Charles Grassley wants the link between WebMD and Lilly investigated because he suspects people may rely on the test, thinking it is objective information when in fact it’s sponsored fluff.

To be fair to WebMD and Lilly, the test is clearly marked as “funded by Lilly.” And there’s a Cymbalta ad sitting on the same page. But that doesn’t excuse the fact that it is rigged. Even if you answer “no” to all of the 10 questions (which are all framed so that the “yes” answer indicates depressed behavior) you still get this response:

Lower Risk:

You may be at risk for major depression.

  • If you have recurring thoughts of death or suicide, call your doctor or any qualified health care provider right away. If you need immediate assistance or think you may have a medical emergency, call 911.

You get this message even if you answer “no” to the question about whether you think about death a lot. Here’s a screen grab of the result for someone who clicks on none of the answers indicating depression:

If you click on more than five “yes” answers you get a similar message, except that you’re diagnosed as “Higher Risk.”

And it’s not difficult for a non-depressed person to click at least four answers that trigger the high-risk diagnosis. Here are four questions that any ordinary person might answer yes to (with my rationalization in parentheses):

I have trouble concentrating.
(In this mobile-web-digital culture, does anyone not have trouble concentrating?)

My appetite has changed. I’m not eating enough, or I’m eating too much.
(We’re in the midst of an obesity crisis and my culture’s role models are all impossibly thin. Of course my appetite has changed.)

I feel tired almost every day.
(Right before bedtime, usually.)

I feel worthless or hopeless.
(I live in a country with historic levels of cultural narcissism and unemployment. Forgive me if I occasionally despair!)

Grassley has asked WebMD to respond by March 4. Perhaps it can explain why even a super happy person taking the test receives the “you may be at risk” answer.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909