corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 17228

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Zarocostas J
Head of WHO’s vaccines advisory group defends its policy on competing interests
BMJ 2010 Feb 17;
http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/extract/340/feb17_2/c987


Abstract:

The chief who oversees the World Health Organization’s top advisory group on global vaccines has defended the oversight mechanism that guards against potential conflicts of interest among its members.

Philippe Duclos, executive secretary of the 15 member Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization (SAGE), said at a press briefing in Geneva that the group strove to ensure “very high standards” to protect against undue influence, whatever the origin.

In recent weeks WHO has been criticised by expert bodies, including the Council of Europe, over allegations that the threat of an H1N1 flu pandemic may have been hyped up as a result of undue influence by the drug industry.

WHO has dismissed these claims.

Keiji Fukuda, WHO’s lead on the H1N1 pandemic, told a hearing of the Council of Europe on 26 January: “The influenza pandemic policies and responses recommended and taken by WHO were not improperly influenced by the . . .

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








...to influence multinational corporations effectively, the efforts of governments will have to be complemented by others, notably the many voluntary organisations that have shown they can effectively represent society’s public-health interests…
A small group known as Healthy Skepticism; formerly the Medical Lobby for Appropriate Marketing) has consistently and insistently drawn the attention of producers to promotional malpractice, calling for (and often securing) correction. These organisations [Healthy Skepticism, Médecins Sans Frontières and Health Action International] are small, but they are capable; they bear malice towards no one, and they are inscrutably honest. If industry is indeed persuaded to face up to its social responsibilities in the coming years it may well be because of these associations and others like them.
- Dukes MN. Accountability of the pharmaceutical industry. Lancet. 2002 Nov 23; 360(9346)1682-4.