corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 17172

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Electronic Source

Wokasch M
5 Major Sources of Market Distrust of the Pharmaceutical Industry
Pharma Reform 2010 Feb 7
http://www.pharmareform.com/2010/02/07/5-major-sources-of-market-distrust-of-the-pharmaceutical-industry/


Full text:

No single event, single offense, issue, or individual company can be identified as the source of or considered responsible for the market distrust of the pharmaceutical industry. This has been a cumulative affect over the past 30 years or so of modern day Pharma. It is important to identify, recognize, and acknowledge the sources of distrust before solutions can credibly and effectively be formulated. Here are the 5 major sources of market distrust of the pharmaceutical industry:

Lack of honesty and full disclosure about product information (Corporate, Marketing, Sales, and Scientific integrity issues)
Not disclosing, not acknowledging or downplaying potential serious adverse reactions and side effects (e.g., many including Fen-Phen, Vioxx®, OxyContin® , Ketek®)
Exaggerated product claims in marketing or in sales presentations…especially comparative claims
Scientific data manipulation to highlight benefits, exaggerate efficacy while carefully downplaying side effects and adverse reactions
Deception in advertising (paid actors or celebrities to project credibility as they play healthcare providers or miraculously recovered or satisfied patients) “Off-label” promotion (e.g., many such as Neurontin® and Bextra®)
Companies not willing to spend the money to prove the claims but willing to encourage physicians to subject patients to uncontrolled experimental use
Questionable physician payments, inducements, and “conflicts of interest”
Extraordinary Speaking fees and resort location training programs
Excessive consulting fees, including suspect clinical study payments
Board of Director fees (hundreds of thousands of dollars)
Office practice meals, tchotchkes, and other perks
Expensive meals, cultural or sporting events (e.g., Broadway shows, golf outings) for physicians and other healthcare providers who can influence prescribing
Pervasiveness of industry influence on scientific and medical communications
Promotional programs presented as CME
CME program development and sponsorship
Medical Science Liaisons as safe harbors for scientific exchange of product information
Publications, including sponsoring ghostwritten articles and books
Journal advertising in medical journals
Scientific and medical conference participation and exhibits
Internet medical information sites
Pricing practices
Pricing fraud (especially as it relates to Medicare and Medicaid)
Unsubstantiated high prices (lacking credible rationale or cost benefit data)
High price increases (recent 9.3% increase compared to -0.3% for general inflation (CPI-U)
This is now a complex, multifaceted, and time entrenched distrust. Can the industry afford to ignore it? If the industry or a company decides to work on this, what should they do? What can they do? Stay tuned.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909