corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 1711

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Petersen M
TV Ads Spur a Rise in Prescription Drug Sales
New York Times 2002 Mar 8
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/03/08/business/08PRES.html


Full text:

Television advertising, aging baby boomers and the greater use of expensive new medications drove prescription drug sales up 17.9 percent last year, a study shows.

Over all, Americans paid about $208 billion last year for prescription drugs – almost double that spent in 1996, according to NDCHealth, a health care information company, which released the study yesterday in Manhattan.

But at the same time, drug companies slowed the rapid pace of some other promotional spending. The companies spent 6 percent more last year on sales representatives, consumer advertising and meetings with doctors, according to the study. In 2000, those promotional costs rose more than 19 percent and 234 percent in 1999.

“This is a very healthy industry,” said Sheldon Silverberg, an expert on pharmaceutical companies at NDCHealth. “People are walking into doctors’ offices after seeing commercials.”

While the number of prescriptions also increased, total drug sales grew at a much faster pace because of price increases by manufacturers and greater use of expensive new medicines like Procrit and Epogen, injectable drugs for anemia that are produced through biotechnology.

Total prescriptions rose 6.6 percent, to 3.3 billion, last year – the equivalent of almost one prescription a month for every American, Mr. Silverberg said.

Prescriptions for antidepressants rose 10 percent, he said. More than seven million people took an antidepressant last year – up 700,000 from 2000. Some of those people may have started taking the drugs, Mr. Silverberg said, after Prozac lost its patent protection and a lower-priced version began to be sold.

The continuing rise of prescription drug costs is becoming an increasingly contentious issue in dozens of states struggling to pay for patients enrolled in Medicaid, and in Washington, where lawmakers are drafting legislation to add a prescription drug benefit to Medicare. Drug costs are also frustrating employers as health insurance premiums continue to rise.

To try to ease the concerns, four drug companies – Pfizer, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline and Novartis – recently created discount cards that allow low-income elderly people to get deep discounts on products.

But the companies continue to increase the number of consumer ads.

The pharmaceutical producers spent $2.8 billion last year on consumer advertising, according to Quintiles Informatics, a consulting firm – an increase of 12 percent. In 2000, consumer advertising increased 31.5 percent.

The most advertised drug last year was Celebrex, for arthritis, followed closely by Vioxx, its competitor. The next-highest advertising expenditures were to promote Allegra and Claritin, two allergy drugs, and Viagra. Pfizer has sharply increased advertising of Viagra because two new medicines for impotence, which will be the drug’s first competitors, are nearing approval.

Most of the companies’ marketing expenses go to pay their armies of sales representatives who visit doctors, nurses, hospitals and managed care companies. The industry had 81,600 sales representatives last year, according to Quintiles, an increase of 45 percent since 1998.

Mr. Silverberg said the drug companies were increasingly inviting doctors to meetings, dinners and other events where their products are promoted. The companies held 370,300 meetings and events for doctors last year – an increase of almost 18 percent.

“Doctors continue to get the lion’s share” of the money spent to promote medicines, Mr. Silverberg said.

http://www.nytimes.com/2002/03/08/business/08PRES.html

——————————————————————————————-

You have to provide spam-amenable information in order to download the NDCHealth presentation. Alex Tsai has included the direct PDF links below. To download the presentation in blocks of 25 pages (each file is approximately 800K): http://www.ndchealth.com/epharma/YIR/pdfs/PharmaTrends2001Pgs1-25.pdf http://www.ndchealth.com/epharma/YIR/pdfs/PharmaTrendsFinal2001Pgs26-50.pdf http://www.ndchealth.com/epharma/YIR/pdfs/PharmaTrendsFinal2001Pgs51-75.pdf http://www.ndchealth.com/epharma/YIR/pdfs/PharmaTrendsFinal2001Pgs76-100.pdf http://www.ndchealth.com/epharma/YIR/pdfs/PharmaTrendsFinal2001Pgs101-125.pdf http://www.ndchealth.com/epharma/YIR/pdfs/PharmaTrendsFinal2001Pgs126-163.pdf

To download the presentation in one big file (4.3MB): http://www.ndchealth.com/epharma/YIR/pdfs/PharmaTrendsFinal01.pdf

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909