corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 16916

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Arnold M
Fewer than 1% of docs sees bias in online CME, survey finds
Medical Marketing & Media 2009 Sep 15
http://www.mmm-online.com/fewer-than-1-of-docs-sees-bias-in-online-cme-survey-finds/article/148995/


Full text:

A Medscape-sponsored survey of a million physicians participating in online CME found that fewer than 1% perceived bias, regardless of whether or not it was commercially supported.

Overall, 93.48% of the 1,064,642 respondents said didn’t perceive bias in the CME they participated in, with another 5.89% expressing no opinion and only .63% saying they did sense bias. Of those participating in commercially-supported CME, .84% perceived bias, while .48% of those participating in non-commercially–supported CME sensed bias.

The survey asked participants to indicate whether they agreed or disagreed, strongly or not, with the statement “The activity was presented objectively and free of commercial bias.” The number of those strongly disagreeing was just .14% overall-.17% of those participating in commercially-supported CME and 11% of those taking part in non-commercially supported CME.

“If commercial support caused bias, our subgroup analysis of those who strongly disagreed would be expected to show a larger difference, not the smaller difference we observed,” wrote the study’s authors.

The study appears in the September issue of The American Journal of Medicine. Its sponsor, WebMD’s Medscape, is a leading provider of online CME, and data came from physicians taking part in online CME through the site. Of 1,621,647 physician participants, around 66% completed the survey

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Cases of wilful misrepresentation are a rarity in medical advertising. For every advertisement in which nonexistent doctors are called on to testify or deliberately irrelevant references are bunched up in [fine print], you will find a hundred or more whose greatest offenses are unquestioning enthusiasm and the skill to communicate it.

The best defence the physician can muster against this kind of advertising is a healthy skepticism and a willingness, not always apparent in the past, to do his homework. He must cultivate a flair for spotting the logical loophole, the invalid clinical trial, the unreliable or meaningless testimonial, the unneeded improvement and the unlikely claim. Above all, he must develop greater resistance to the lure of the fashionable and the new.
- Pierre R. Garai (advertising executive) 1963