corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 16893

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Electronic Source

Edwards J
Lilly Urged Zyprexa Use Without Proper Diagnosis
BNet 2009 Dec 2
http://industry.bnet.com/pharma/10005608/lilly-urged-zyprexa-use-without-proper-diagnosis/


Full text:

Eli Lilly (LLY) tried to persuade primary care doctors to prescribe Zyprexa to elderly patients with dementia even when those doctors believed patients should be seen by a psychiatrist first or that there was no diagnostic basis to prescribe the drug, according to a federal court ruling.

Download Hood v. Lilly here.
Internal Lilly documents tell reps that “Even if the doctor does not have diagnosis, he should treat anyway” when it comes to Zyprexa and dementia and/or schizophrenia.

The strategy was part of Lilly’s “LTC Strategy,” the ruling states. Lilly did not have approval from the FDA to promote Zyprexa for dementia; its main approval was for schizophrenia, the Mississippi ruling says.

The ruling gave a surprise victory to Lilly, a win that becomes even more surprising once you read all 117 pages of it. The judge said the state had not proved that off-label promotion of Zyprexa had wasted the state’s Medicaid dollars because the state only offered “generalized expert analyses” instead of individualized proof. That judgment came despite the fact that Lilly earlier pleaded guilty to illegal promotion of the drug.

The ruling states that Lilly targeted the elderly in long term care facilities for dementia “But Lilly never followed through with its attempt to obtain FDA approval for a dementia indication.”

Lilly’s strategy was to target primary care physicians, not psychiatric specialists. If those doctors were reluctant to prescribe Zyprexa – perhaps they felt their family care experience was not enough to make an informed decision – reps were to tell them to write the drug anyway, the ruling states:

If the primary care docs objected, reps were given this script:

Patients with moderate to severe symptoms of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder should be treated by a psychiatrist. However, in your own practice there are probably patients who may experience symptoms such as elevated mood, emotional withdrawal and agitation who may benefit from Zyprexa. Keep in mind that referrals can be expensive, time consuming, or logistically difficult.

If the doctor still resisted, reps had these last-gasp strategies, including one which suggests that docs should write the drug because everyone else is doing it: “Early adopters are prescribing it for the elderly.”

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909