corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 16836

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Electronic Source

Silverman E
House Bill Wants Pharma To Disclose CME Funding
Pharmalot 2009 Nov 13
http://www.pharmalot.com/2009/11/house-bill-wants-pharma-to-disclose-cme-funding/#more-19838


Full text:

The health care reform bill passed by the House would force drugmakers to disclose how much they spend on continuing medical education classes for docs, although the Senate version doesn’t include such a requirement, according to The Wall Street Journal. The paper notes this comes as for-profit CME firms experience falling revenue.
The Senate’s Special Committee on Aging, meanwhile, is investigating industry-funded CME, the Journal continues, and John Kamp, who heads the Coalition for Healthcare Communication, wrote Kohl the committee “should consider elimination of certified CME reporting in all versions of health-care reform bills because they are unneeded, redundant and needlessly expensive.” The group is sponsored by the American Association of Advertising Agencies; some agencies have units that run CME classes.
Industry funding of CME is criticized by some for unduly influencing medical practice. “The vast majority of industry-funded CME programs are simply infomercials for the funding company’s latest drug or device,” Dan Carlat, a Massachusetts psychiatrist and an associate professor at Tufts University’s medical school, tells the Journal, noting he owns a CME company that doesn’t take industry money.
Meanwhile, the paper reports that industry funding for CME in general, including seminars held by nonprofit groups and hospitals, dropped 14 percent last year to $1 billion, according to the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education, which found industry payments to for-profit CME firms dropped 22 percent last year to $463 million from $594 million a year earlier. The Journal reminds us tht Pfizer and GlaxoSmithKline will no longer directly fund for-profit CME firms.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909