corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 1681

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

FDA hits Elan, Pharmacia and Roche on ad practices
FDA news Daily Bulletin 2002 Feb 26


Full text:

The FDA last week posted three new untitled letters on its website, reflecting common concerns of the agency’s Division of Drug Marketing, Communications and Advertising (DDMAC), according to food and drug attorneys.

Elan Jan. 16 received an untitled letter regarding a visual aid promoting its Zanaflex, a drug intended to manage spasticity. The visual aid implied an overly broad indication for the product by failing to convey its limitations, according to the letter. The promotional material described Zanaflex as the “#1 antispasticity agent.” This claim “fails to communicate that Zanaflex is a short-acting drug,” the agency wrote. View the document at http://www.fda.gov/cder/warn/2002/10596.pdf . Untitled letters also were issued to: *Pharmacia: A journal ad for the ophthalmic product Xalatan minimized its risks, the FDA charged. Specifically, the ad featured efficacy claims on the front page while relegating risk information to the back of the ad. The letter is available for download at http://www.fda.gov/cder/warn/2002/10562.pdf . *Roche: A direct-to-consumer print ad stated, “Finally, oral chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer.” The ad didn’t mention any product by name. However, the only oral chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer is Roche’s Xeloda. Therefore, the ad constitutes a product-specific ad and should have included risk information, the FDA wrote. Download the letter at http://www.fda.gov/cder/warn/2002/10521.pdf .

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909