corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 16804

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Ecuador overrides 2,000 pharma patents
PM Live 2009 Nov 26
http://www.pmlive.com/find_an_article/allarticles/categories/General/2009/october/news/ecuador_overrides_2,000_pharma_patents


Full text:

President Correa of Ecuador has announced a presidential decree overriding a significant number of pharmaceutical patents in a move to promote local production of medicines.

The Ecuadorian government has said that it wishes to promote local production of medicines to avoid “the huge profits of trans-nationals”, based on an industrial and intellectual property system which Correa defines as “neo-liberal”.

In a statement, President Rafael Correa said that access to medicine is a “human right” and that he intended to seek “compulsory licenses” to acquire medications considered “indispensable”.

Under current World Trade Organisation (WTO) rules, countries have the right to seek “compulsory licenses” that override traditional patent rights. Current WTO rules require that such countries negotiate with the patent owners to determine fair compensation.

“All those pharmaceutical products we can produce and copy, we will elaborate in Ecuador”, said Correa.

The action by President Correa is in line with recent statements that the government would not honour the illegitimate debt that had been placed on the country by foreign banks (under previous administrations). It reflects disquiet in some quarters about the pricing levels imposed by pharmaceutical companies in poorer countries, such as Ecuador, while drugs are patent protected.

PMLiVE asked Paul Chapman, European Patent Attorney, partner in Kilburn & Strode LLP and member of the Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys’ (CIPA) Biotechnology Committee how might the Ecuadorian situation be resolved? “I would expect,” said Mr Chapman, “the pharma companies to engage in negotiation as per the terms of TRIPs, since compulsory licences cannot generally be granted unless there has been an attempt to obtain a licence from the patent proprietor on “reasonable” terms. The ultimate sanction would presumably be to report Ecuador to the WTO for a breach of the rules should they go ahead.”

Mr Chapman added: “The Trade-related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPs) provisions, which form part of the WTO rules, allow for the grant of compulsory licences under certain circumstances. These are quite specific and only envisage grant of such a licence under very limited circumstances. Medicine prices in Europe, for example, are usually determined through local mechanisms involving Governmental agencies and as such it is difficult to see how any application for a compulsory licence would be successful in Europe.”

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909