corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 16655

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Connelly DP, Rich EC, Curley SP, Kelly JT.
Knowledge resource preferences of family physicians.
J Fam Pract 1990 Mar; 30:(3):353-9
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2248632


Abstract:

Because of the pivotal role of medical knowledge in clinical problem solving, it is important to understand how clinicians decide to seek additional knowledge for patient care decisions and how they choose among the resources available to them. Using a self-administered questionnaire, 126 family physicians reported their use of 11 types of knowledge resources for answering patient-specific questions arising in clinical practice. They reported almost daily use of the Physicians’ Desk Reference and more often than weekly use of colleagues. There was little use reported of Index Medicus or computer-based bibliographic retrieval systems. The research literature of medicine was used infrequently and rated among the lowest of resources in terms of credibility, availability, searchability, understandability, and applicability. In deciding among a subset of knowledge resources for answering a clinical practice question, resource cost variables related to clinical availability and applicability of the information to the problem at hand appeared to be more influential in the minds of physicians than factors related to quality of the resource. These findings have important implications for the development and deployment of knowledge resources intended to be useful and used in clinical practice.

Keywords:
* Diagnosis * Faculty, Medical * Humans * Information Services/utilization * Internal Medicine/education * Minnesota * Online Systems/utilization * Periodicals as Topic * Physicians, Family/statistics & numerical data* * Questionnaires * Reference Books * Research

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909