corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 16568

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Chisholm CD, Gentile NT, Gerhardt RT, Hauswald M, Mycyk MB, Sinert R, Sokolove PE
Medical Advertisements in Medical Journals: the Case Against
Academic Emergency Medicine 2009 Oct 1; 16:(10):981 - 983
http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/122615073/abstract


Abstract:

The mission of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) is ‘‘To improve patient care by advancing research and education in emergency medicine.’’ We, the undersigned members of the editorial board of SAEM’s journal, Academic Emergency Medicine (AEM), believe that accepting pharmaceutical and medical device advertising would directly conflict with this mission. AEM does not currently have such advertising; we believe that it should retain this status. Furthermore, we argue that no peer-reviewed or academic medical journal should accept advertisements for pharmaceuticals or medical devices.

Candid and detailed discussions regarding this matter were held among members of the editorial board both online and at national meetings. We noted, not surprisingly, that the sole impetus for altering our journal’s ‘‘no advertising’’ practice was financial. Historically, AEM has had sufficient funding to maintain its habitually high volume of quality manuscripts. Additional revenue is always welcome; we can all think of meritorious projects that SAEM and AEM could undertake if we had more income, but we think that incorporating medical advertisements into our funding stream would compromise our journal’s mission and high standards. AEM represents one of the most visible and widely distributed faces of SAEM. In this role, it should serve as both a standard and a leader for our specialty.

We do not seek to debate the merits of the pharmaceutical or medical device industries…

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909