corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 16163

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Taylor L.
Drugmakers offer Philippines further price cuts
Pharma Times 2009 Jul 30
http://www.pharmatimes.com/WorldNews/article.aspx?id=16327


Full text:

Pharmaceutical manufacturers have begun voluntarily offering the Philippines government price cuts on more of their products, as it is announced that further reductions are likely to be sought.

Health Secretary Francisco Duque said yesterday that the list of 21 essential medicines whose prices were reduced by 50% this week – 16 through voluntary compliance by the manufacturers and five through an Executive Order signed by President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo – will be reviewed after three months to see if the prices of further drugs also need to be halved.

Yesterday it was reported that, so far, offers of price cuts had been made on at least 20 other medicines, ranging from 10% to 50%.

Dr Roberto So, programme manager at the Department of Health’s drug policy unit, said that the offers had been received relating to a range of products, including insulin and the breast cancer treatment tamoxifen. However, he added, these would not be accepted automatically, because health officials are proposing to set maximum retail prices based on a range of indicators, including prices abroad, the discounts which are available to consumers through manufacturers’ card schemes and five-year price trends based on the entry pricing levels of generics.

The list will be produced soon, said Dr So, and he hoped that more companies would offer voluntary price reductions.

According to Health Sec Duque, the original 21 products on which the 50% price cut was sought were selected because they: – were the most expensive but most essential drugs on the market; – have no generic competitors; – cost four to five times more in the Philippines than in other markets; and – address serious and widespread medical problems such as asthma, cancer, diabetes, high cholesterol, hypertension and infections.

These reductions will take effect on August 15. Industry spokesmen are forecasting that they will reduce sales on the national market by anywhere between $145 million and $208 million and will do great harm to foreign investment opportunities in the country. Observers also note that the Philippines is one of the few countries in Asia to impose a levy on drug sales, and are calling on the government to abolish this tax.

Drugstores will have one month to apply the price caps; calls from smaller businesses for a three-month deadline for compliance have been rejected by the government.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909