corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 16137

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Pharma PR: Who do you trust?
World of DTC Marketing 2009 Jul 29
http://www.worldofdtcmarketing.com/files/507516ba83b07b4c9353f2069d2634b0-760.html#unique-entry-id-760


Full text:

It would be interesting to do a survey among the public and ask them how much they trust pharmaceutical public relations to “convey” the truth when it comes product or safety issues. Considering that some companies have been caught manipulating data in order to defuse issues one has to wonder, when it comes to PR, who comes first investors or patients?

Public Relations, or as I prefer to call it investor relations, is a company function and as thus the PR people do what they are told sometimes against their better judgement. Public relation’s main roles today are building and sustaining a public image and
generating awareness to influence public opinion an (PR) is often an umbrella term that includes activities ranging from community and press relations to speech-writing and issues management. However with the growth of the Internet transparency and speed have become necessities and PR people seem to forget this.

All too often it seems that PR people, when confronted with issues, hide behind sayings like “we’re studying the data” or “there is no indication that…” People today want and need transparency especially when the media reports potential new side effects with a prescription drug that we may be taking. But PR is a company function and as thus they do what is necessary to support the company no matter how foolish or blind it makes them look.

If Pharma is to become more customer driven and transparent it must do so from the the top down. Information has to be released with one objective in mind: we have to do what is right for our patients not investors.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Far too large a section of the treatment of disease is to-day controlled by the big manufacturing pharmacists, who have enslaved us in a plausible pseudo-science...
The blind faith which some men have in medicines illustrates too often the greatest of all human capacities - the capacity for self deception...
Some one will say, Is this all your science has to tell us? Is this the outcome of decades of good clinical work, of patient study of the disease, of anxious trial in such good faith of so many drugs? Give us back the childlike trust of the fathers in antimony and in the lancet rather than this cold nihilism. Not at all! Let us accept the truth, however unpleasant it may be, and with the death rate staring us in the face, let us not be deceived with vain fancies...
we need a stern, iconoclastic spirit which leads, not to nihilism, but to an active skepticism - not the passive skepticism, born of despair, but the active skepticism born of a knowledge that recognizes its limitations and knows full well that only in this attitude of mind can true progress be made.
- William Osler 1909