corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 16115

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Federal Court Grants Public Access to Evidence that Drug Company 'Ghostwrote' Medical Articles About Deadly Hormone Thearpy Drug
Public Justice Foundation 2009 Jul 24
http://www.tlpj.org/Newsroom/News/federal-judge-unseals.aspx


Full text:

A federal judge in Arkansas granted public access today to evidence that Wyeth Pharmaceuticals “ghostwrote” medical articles regarding its hormone therapy drug Prempro, which a national study has shown increase a woman’s risk of stroke, heart attack, blood clots, cardiovascular disease, and cancer.
The evidence has been under seal in an ongoing federal lawsuit filed on behalf of victims of Prempro. Public Justice, a national public interest law firm headquartered in Washington D.C., sought access to the evidence on behalf of PLoS Medicine, a medical journal published by the non-profit Public Library of Science (PLOS). Along with the New York Times, PLOS had moved to interevene in the case to unseal the ghostwriting documents because the public has powerful interest in knowing the truth about the drug companies’ conduct and the safety of their drugs.
“We are thrilled by the Court’s decision to stop Wyeth’s attempt to hide evidence of its ghostwriting,” said Amy Radon, Public Justice’s lead attorney for PLoS Medicine. “Public health and safety is put at serious risk when a drug company fails to reveal its role in authoring a medical journal article touting its own product.”

The ghostwriting evidence in the Prempro litigation, which is ongoing, was under seal due to a confidentiality order that permitted Wyeth to shield from public inspection any material that Wyeth itself deemed to be “confidential.”
In his July 24 ruling, U.S. District Court Judge Bill Wilson, Jr., held that there was no good cause for secrecy and ordered that the documents be made publicly available as of 5:00 p.m. on Friday, July 31.
The New York Times reported last December that the secret documents include evidence of a “mammoth” ghostwriting campaign involving Prempro. U.S. Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, has this material as part of a congressional investigation into drug industry influence on doctors.

“Wyeth did not even attempt to show good cause for keeping these documents secret,” said Morgan “Chip” Welch of Arkansas’ Welch and Kitchens, LLC. “Judge Wilson’s decision will undoubtedly save lives.”

To read the District Court’s order, click here. http://www.tlpj.org/Repository/Files/Prempro_OrderUnsealing_072409.pdf
To read Public Justice’s brief in support of PLoS Medicine’s motion to intervene, click here.http://www.tlpj.org/Repository/Files/Prempro_BriefinSupportInterveneFINALV2_4.PDF
To read Public Justice’s brief in support of PLoS Medicine’s motion for access to the materials in this case, click here.http://www.tlpj.org/Repository/Files/Prempro_BriefinSupportUnsealFINAL_5.PDF
To read the New York Times article about Wyeth’s ghostwriting campaign, click here.http://www.tlpj.org/Key-Issues-Cases/Access-To-Justice.aspx

To learn more about our Access to Justice Campaign, click here.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








As an advertising man, I can assure you that advertising which does not work does not continue to run. If experience did not show beyond doubt that the great majority of doctors are splendidly responsive to current [prescription drug] advertising, new techniques would be devised in short order. And if, indeed, candor, accuracy, scientific completeness, and a permanent ban on cartoons came to be essential for the successful promotion of [prescription] drugs, advertising would have no choice but to comply.
- Pierre R. Garai (advertising executive) 1963