corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 15986

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Mann M.
Other Probes Still On after State AGs Settle with Merck, S-P
GoozNews 2009 Jul 16
http://www.gooznews.com/node/3012


Full text:

Drug makers Merck and Schering Plough struck a $5.4 million deal yesterday with 35 state attorneys general to resolve an investigation into the companies’ lengthy delay in releasing negative results from the ENHANCE trial, which showed that ezetimibe combined with cholesterol-lowering simvastatin was no better than simvastatin alone. As previously discussed on Gooznews, the trial was completed in May 2006, but the results were not announced until January 2008.

During the lengthy delay, the companies engaged in aggressive direct-to-consumer (DTC) marketing of their two ezetimibe products, Zetia and Vytorin, spending $200 million on DTC marketing in 2007 alone, according to a study published last year in the New England Journal of Medicine.

The settlement extends the terms that Merck agreed to last year in its settlement with the states over its marketing of rofecoxib (Vioxx) to marketing of ezetimibe. According to a press release issued by the Illinois attorney general, the settlement requires the companies to:

Obtain preapproval from the FDA for all DTC television advertisements, and comply with FDA suggestions to modify the advertising;
Register clinical trials and post their results;
Refrain from ghostwriting articles for medical journals;
Reduce conflicts of interest for members of data safety monitoring boards; and
Comply with detailed rules prohibiting the deceptive use of clinical trials.

Drug companies are not required to submit DTC TV ads to the FDA for preapproval, although some companies do so voluntarily. Last year, an article in the Journal of the American Medical Association detailed how Merck engaged in ghostwriting of articles on rofecoxib.

As described in detail on the Shearlings Got Plowed blog, the settlement resolves only a small portion of the litigation and governmental investigations the companies face over their flawed handling of the ENHANCE trial.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Cases of wilful misrepresentation are a rarity in medical advertising. For every advertisement in which nonexistent doctors are called on to testify or deliberately irrelevant references are bunched up in [fine print], you will find a hundred or more whose greatest offenses are unquestioning enthusiasm and the skill to communicate it.

The best defence the physician can muster against this kind of advertising is a healthy skepticism and a willingness, not always apparent in the past, to do his homework. He must cultivate a flair for spotting the logical loophole, the invalid clinical trial, the unreliable or meaningless testimonial, the unneeded improvement and the unlikely claim. Above all, he must develop greater resistance to the lure of the fashionable and the new.
- Pierre R. Garai (advertising executive) 1963