corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 15959

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Edwards J.
Pfizer Catches Flak for Giving Drug Discounts to Some But Not All Filipinos
BNet 2009 Jul 8
http://industry.bnet.com/pharma/10003013/pfizer-catches-flak-for-giving-drug-discounts-to-some-but-not-all-filipinos/


Full text:

Pfizer has been criticized for offering some Filipinos discounts of up to 60 percent on its drugs because the discounts are not available to all. In the Philippines, Pfizer promotes a “Sulit Patient Care Program” in which holders of the Sulit card get discounts on various Pfizer drugs. About 1.9 million patients have taken advantage of it, Pfizer claims.

The problem, according to the Business Mirror’s hyperbolic columnist, Lito Gagni, is that:

… the cards are usually handed out in expensive hospitals that are visited by medical representatives.

… So, because Mang Juan, with his hands gnarled from overwork, and countless other poor Filipinos can never hope to be treated in an expensive hospital, they can never hope to ever possess a Sulit 50-percent discount card for Pfizer products.

The Sulit card was a response to criticism that Pfizer opposed the import of cheap Pfizer drugs from India. (Sounds familiar!) Pfizer countered that it was extending the Sulit benefit:

… we are about to extend its benefits to millions more patients in partnership with the Government Service Insurance System and other major health-care providers who share the view that the program is good for the Philippines.

Gagni wasn’t mollified:

[Pfizer’s] card gimmick has “1.9 million Filipino beneficiaries.” But according to Social Welfare Secretary Esperanza Cabral, a respected cardiologist, there are more than 17 million hypertensive Filipinos who should have access to more affordable treatment. Unfortunately, they are not Sulit-enrolled.

Doubtless Pfizer will file this one under “no good deed goes unpunished.”

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Cases of wilful misrepresentation are a rarity in medical advertising. For every advertisement in which nonexistent doctors are called on to testify or deliberately irrelevant references are bunched up in [fine print], you will find a hundred or more whose greatest offenses are unquestioning enthusiasm and the skill to communicate it.

The best defence the physician can muster against this kind of advertising is a healthy skepticism and a willingness, not always apparent in the past, to do his homework. He must cultivate a flair for spotting the logical loophole, the invalid clinical trial, the unreliable or meaningless testimonial, the unneeded improvement and the unlikely claim. Above all, he must develop greater resistance to the lure of the fashionable and the new.
- Pierre R. Garai (advertising executive) 1963