corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 15957

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Arnold M.
DTC ads driving fewer to their doctors, says survey
Medical Marketing & Media 2009 Jul 8
http://www.mmm-online.com/DTC-ads-driving-fewer-to-their-doctors-says-survey/article/139734/?DCMP=EMC-MMM_Consumer


Full text:

Consumers are less likely to seek information about prescription medications and to talk to their doctors about advertised drugs than they were last year, according to Rodale’s annual Consumer Reaction to DTC Advertising of Prescription Drugs survey. Nonetheless, the survey’s findings suggest that direct-to-consumer advertising stimulates 32 million Americans to seek treatment for a medical condition about which they had no prior discussion with their doctor, said Rodale, and they are increasingly seeking information in health videos and user-generated content online.

The telephone survey of 1,501 US adults, Rodale’s 12th, found that the number of respondents saying an ad prompted them to seek information about a condition declined 5 points to 29%. Similarly, 33% said an ad prompted them to seek information about a drug a family member were taking – down 6 points from last year – and 30% said they sought info about a drug they were taking after seeing an ad, down 7 points.

Altogether, 28% of respondents said they had talked to a doctor about a specific medicine they saw or heard advertised – that’s below the 8-year average of 33% and well down from last year’s 40%, though the number has see-sawed in recent years.

One factor could be declining spending on DTC. Print advertising by drug companies plummeted 18% in 2008 while TV spend was flat, and overall, DTC will slip further in 2009, the survey’s authors predicted. It’s clear, too, that the economy is impacting consumer behavior, with 32% reporting switching to a generic and 27% saying they had canceled or delayed a doctor visit to cut down on medical expenses. More ominously, 15% reported skipping doses or splitting pills, 16% said they’d stopped taking a prescription medication to save money and 18% sought help through access and affordability programs.

Even as the percentage of those who said they looked online for information about a specific medicine slipped 5 points (to 48%), consumers reported using emerging online channels in significant numbers. Nearly 50% of those seeking health information online called health videos a top resource, while 55% searched user-generated content sites. Among them, 36% said they’d searched for health info on Wikipedia, while another 36% said they’d read online forums or message boards and 27% had read a blog post on health-related topics.

Consumer perceptions of drug companies and their ads were largely unchanged.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Cases of wilful misrepresentation are a rarity in medical advertising. For every advertisement in which nonexistent doctors are called on to testify or deliberately irrelevant references are bunched up in [fine print], you will find a hundred or more whose greatest offenses are unquestioning enthusiasm and the skill to communicate it.

The best defence the physician can muster against this kind of advertising is a healthy skepticism and a willingness, not always apparent in the past, to do his homework. He must cultivate a flair for spotting the logical loophole, the invalid clinical trial, the unreliable or meaningless testimonial, the unneeded improvement and the unlikely claim. Above all, he must develop greater resistance to the lure of the fashionable and the new.
- Pierre R. Garai (advertising executive) 1963