corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 15818

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Chepesiuk R, Cooper RJ, Schriger DL.
Standards for pharmaceutical advertising in Canada
CMAJ 2005 Aug 2; 173:(3):238
http://www.cmaj.ca/cgi/reprint/173/3/238.pdf


Abstract:

Richelle Cooper and David Schriger1
report their analysis of original research
cited in pharmaceutical advertisements
appearing in medical journals published
in the United States. However, the
standards for advertisements in US medical
journals differ from those for Canadian
ones. Almost all of the advertisements
appearing in the latter are reviewed
and precleared by the Pharmaceutical
Advertising Advisory Board (PAAB). The
standards of the PAAB “Code of Advertising
Acceptance” are publicly available.

We thank Ray Chepesiuk for identifying
important differences between
Canada and the United States in
the regulation of pharmaceutical advertisements
and applaud the Canadian effort.
Canadian regulations with regard to
prerelease review of advertisements are
unquestionably more stringent.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Cases of wilful misrepresentation are a rarity in medical advertising. For every advertisement in which nonexistent doctors are called on to testify or deliberately irrelevant references are bunched up in [fine print], you will find a hundred or more whose greatest offenses are unquestioning enthusiasm and the skill to communicate it.

The best defence the physician can muster against this kind of advertising is a healthy skepticism and a willingness, not always apparent in the past, to do his homework. He must cultivate a flair for spotting the logical loophole, the invalid clinical trial, the unreliable or meaningless testimonial, the unneeded improvement and the unlikely claim. Above all, he must develop greater resistance to the lure of the fashionable and the new.
- Pierre R. Garai (advertising executive) 1963