corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 15663

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: Journal Article

Grens K.
Pharma on Facebook?
The Scientist 2009 May 1; 23:(5):19
http://www.the-scientist.com/article/display/55631/


Abstract:

Tweet, tweet: “Asthma” has sent you a new message.

Within ten minutes after placing a phone call to say I was attending a Philadelphia conference for pharmaceutical
marketing professionals who want to jump on the social media bandwagon, an electronic version of the childhood game
“telephone” was in full swing. Bloggers at the conference posted notes online that a reporter was on her way; word got
to people who were attending the conference via Twitter; and as I picked up my coat to leave my office the phone
rang-someone at a company in Delaware wanted to learn more about my article.

That’s precisely the viral, word-of-mouth power of online social networking media that pharmaceutical companies want to
be more a part of. Some of the most popular networking sites include Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn, totaling millions
of users-and potentially, millions of customers…

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








Cases of wilful misrepresentation are a rarity in medical advertising. For every advertisement in which nonexistent doctors are called on to testify or deliberately irrelevant references are bunched up in [fine print], you will find a hundred or more whose greatest offenses are unquestioning enthusiasm and the skill to communicate it.

The best defence the physician can muster against this kind of advertising is a healthy skepticism and a willingness, not always apparent in the past, to do his homework. He must cultivate a flair for spotting the logical loophole, the invalid clinical trial, the unreliable or meaningless testimonial, the unneeded improvement and the unlikely claim. Above all, he must develop greater resistance to the lure of the fashionable and the new.
- Pierre R. Garai (advertising executive) 1963