Healthy Skepticism Library item: 15632

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

Publication type: Journal Article

Moynihan R.
Merck defends Vioxx in court, as publisher apologises for fake journal
BMJ. 2009 May 11; 338:
http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/extract/338/may11_1/b1914

Abstract:

Merck has begun the defence of its anti-arthritis drug rofecoxib (Vioxx) in the Federal Court of Australia, amid revelations that it lobbied to quash similar legal action in Britain, and as a publisher apologised for a journal sponsored by the company.

The United States based company is fighting a class action from more than 1000 Australians, led by Graeme Peterson, who had a heart attack in 2003 after taking rofecoxib for several years.

Over the past month Mr Peterson’s lawyers have released many internal company documents showing, they claim, how Merck’s marketing tried to minimise safety concerns about the drug and to “neutralise” and “discredit” potential critics. They also say that the company created an entire medical journal that appeared to be a legitimate peer reviewed journal but that in reality was simply a “marketing publication” (BMJ 2009;338:b1714, 28 Apr, doi:10.1136/bmj.b1714).

Opening the defence case last week, . . .