corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 15577

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: news

Gram D.
Vt. House working on expanded drug disclosure bill
Forbes.com 2009 May 1
http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2009/05/01/ap6367240.html


Full text:

Vermont lawmakers want to make it much tougher for drug company sales representatives to court doctors with free lunches and other perks designed to get their products into patients’ medicine cabinets.

They are considering a bill that would impose stricter limits on drug companies’ direct sales pitches to health providers and require public disclosure whenever sales reps makes their rounds.

The House Health Committee on Thursday put its finishing touches on a Senate-passed bill that would toughen a disclosure bill first passed in 2002.

The work came two weeks after Attorney General William Sorrell’s office issued its annual report on drug marketing efforts in the state. The report said drug companies spent nearly $3 million in Vermont in consulting fees, meals, gifts and similar expenses directed at doctors and other prescribers in the year ended June 30.

One doctor received more than $15,000 worth of free meals during that year, according to the report. More than 200 doctors received more than $500 worth of free food each, it said.

But under a “trade secrets exemption” in the 2002 law, the attorney general couldn’t say who was paying for or getting the food, cash payments and other gifts.

“It makes sense that Vermonters be able to see how much, if any, individual doctors are receiving in cash payments and from the manufacturers of which particular drugs,” Sorrell said.

The attorney general said the gifts create at least the perception of a conflict of interest.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








You are going to have many difficulties. The smokers will not like your message. The tobacco interests will be vigorously opposed. The media and the government will be loath to support these findings. But you have one factor in your favour. What you have going for you is that you are right.
- Evarts Graham
See:
When truth is unwelcome: the first reports on smoking and lung cancer.