corner
Healthy Skepticism
Join us to help reduce harm from misleading health information.
Increase font size   Decrease font size   Print-friendly view   Print
Register Log in

Healthy Skepticism Library item: 15355

Warning: This library includes all items relevant to health product marketing that we are aware of regardless of quality. Often we do not agree with all or part of the contents.

 

Publication type: report

MHRA
Advertising complaint: Qvar (beclometasone dipropionate): Leavepiece
: MHRA 2009 Mar 20
http://www.mhra.gov.uk/Howweregulate/Medicines/Advertisingofmedicines/Advertisinginvestigations/CON041380


Abstract:

A healthcare professional complained to the MHRA about an advertisement for Qvar produced by Teva, which was published in January 2008. The complainant was concerned that the leavepiece was misleading because it contained the claim, “Qvar has equivalent efficacy to fluticasone and CFC-beclometasone at equivalent doses”.
The MHRA upheld the complaint. Teva stated that they had already withdrawn the leavepiece in March 2008 and amended the claim to state, “Qvar has equivalent efficacy to fluticasone and CFC-beclometasone at equivalent therapeutic doses”.
This is consistent with the SPC which states, “The recommended total daily dose of Qvar is lower than that for current Beclometasone dipropionate CFC containing products and should be adjusted to the needs of the individual patient” and “Patients on fluticasone inhalers may be transferred to the same total daily dose of Qvar up to 800 micrograms daily”.

 

  Healthy Skepticism on RSS   Healthy Skepticism on Facebook   Healthy Skepticism on Twitter

Please
Click to Register

(read more)

then
Click to Log in
for free access to more features of this website.

Forgot your username or password?

You are invited to
apply for membership
of Healthy Skepticism,
if you support our aims.

Pay a subscription

Support our work with a donation

Buy Healthy Skepticism T Shirts


If there is something you don't like, please tell us. If you like our work, please tell others.

Email a Friend








...to influence multinational corporations effectively, the efforts of governments will have to be complemented by others, notably the many voluntary organisations that have shown they can effectively represent society’s public-health interests…
A small group known as Healthy Skepticism; formerly the Medical Lobby for Appropriate Marketing) has consistently and insistently drawn the attention of producers to promotional malpractice, calling for (and often securing) correction. These organisations [Healthy Skepticism, Médecins Sans Frontières and Health Action International] are small, but they are capable; they bear malice towards no one, and they are inscrutably honest. If industry is indeed persuaded to face up to its social responsibilities in the coming years it may well be because of these associations and others like them.
- Dukes MN. Accountability of the pharmaceutical industry. Lancet. 2002 Nov 23; 360(9346)1682-4.